When the Fed decides
to remove accommodation from its policy, which it already has hinted at doing
with its recent tapering, it will need to start thinking about reducing the
size of its balance sheet as well as preventing inflation and future bubbles in
both the asset and housing markets. Once tapering has progressed to the point
where the Fed is no longer making monthly purchases of long-term bonds,
therefore, it should consider starting to sell some of its securities, a
fitting conclusion to the quantitative easing program that the Fed has put in
place.
The Fed Funds
interest rate is a separate tool from the QE, whose purpose is to affect
short-term interest rates, not long-term ones. Therefore, changes regarding the
Fed Funds rate should not be tied to changes in QE. However, if the economy seems
to be returning to pre-recession levels, the Fed should not hesitate to raise
the Fed Funds rate, as that is the primary tool that it uses. As to the
magnitude by which the rate will be raised, that should depend partially on the
Fed’s forecast on the economy and the different paths that the economy would
take based on differing interest rates, and partially on future predictions of
different economic indicators to adhere to the Taylor Rule.
In terms of other
interest rates, the Fed should keep an eye on the discount rate and the
interest paid on excess reserves, but as the economy recovers, these tools
should be secondary to the Fed Funds rate. Because these interest rates affect
specific aspects of the financial market, only when these factors change
drastically should the Fed touch them. For example, if bank lending, as it has
been doing, stagnates to the point where trillions of dollars of excess
reserves are being held at the Fed, then the interest paid on those reserves
should fall (ignoring the zero-bound) until bank lending reaches an acceptable
level. Also, if the economy proves slow to recover, but the Fed still needs to
shrink its balance sheet, lowering the interest on excess reserves to increase
lending while at the same time selling securities provides a way to enact
expansionary policy while also reducing the size of the Fed’s balance sheet.
Also, because the
Fed has a responsibility to ensure the stability and survival of the financial
market, it should take a more active role in bank regulation. The Fed is the
institution that knows its own goals, and whether or not they are being
achieved, better than any other organization. Because the actions of banks
significantly impact the financial market as a whole, and the Fed knows better
than anyone else where the financial market needs to be, it follows that the
Fed would know what the banks ought to do to keep the financial market stable
and growing. Therefore, the responsibility to institute regulation to
incentivize banks to do what’s best for the market should lie with the Fed.
No comments:
Post a Comment